Updated August 5, 2026

The Omnivore alternative for people who do not want to self-host.

Omnivore shut down in November 2024 after ElevenLabs bought the team. If you loved that it was free and open but you do not want to run a server, here are the best alternatives in 2026 - honestly sorted by why you used Omnivore, including the free one we built.

Quick answer

Omnivore shut down on November 15, 2024. Pick your replacement by why you used it: for highlighting and Obsidian sync, Readwise Reader; for a cheaper hosted reader, Readplace; for open-source self-hosting, Wallabag; if you live in Obsidian, its free Web Clipper. For a free, hosted home for everything you save - WhatsApp, Telegram, screenshots, and the web - with plain-language search and no server to run, MarkIt.

What happened to Omnivore

Omnivore was a free, open-source read-later app that people loved for a specific reason: it was genuinely free, you could highlight and sync into Obsidian, and because it was open source you could, in theory, own your data.

On November 1, 2024, ElevenLabs acquired the Omnivore team to work on its ElevenReader app. Two weeks later, on November 15, 2024, the Omnivore service shut down and user data was deleted. People got a 14-day window to export years of saved articles, highlights, and notes. ElevenLabs wanted the team, not the product - so the product was switched off.

That left two kinds of refugees. One group wants the highlighting-and-notes workflow back and will pay for it. The other group just wants a free place to save things again and does not want to stand up and babysit the open-source code themselves. This comparison is honest about which tool fits which group - and MarkIt is squarely aimed at the second.

Pick by why you used Omnivore

There is no single "best" Omnivore alternative, because people used Omnivore for different things. Match your reason to the tool:

  • You highlighted articles and synced to Obsidian. Go to Readwise Reader - it is the closest match, if you accept the ~$119/year.
  • You want a cheaper hosted reader. Readplace pitched itself straight at Omnivore refugees at ~$49/year.
  • Open source and self-hosting were the point. Wallabag is the maintained open-source reader you can host yourself.
  • Obsidian is already your brain. The free Obsidian Web Clipper saves clean markdown into your vault.
  • You just want a free place to save things again, with no server. That is MarkIt - and it also catches the stuff a reader never did: WhatsApp and Telegram forwards, screenshots with OCR, TikToks, and PDFs.

The honest headline: if highlighting was the point, MarkIt is not your tool. If a free, zero-maintenance home for everything you save is the point, keep reading.

The full comparison

Six options, scored on free access, capture breadth, recall, and the highlighting layer Omnivore was known for - so you can see exactly which one fits your reason for leaving. MarkIt is ours; we have called out where we fit and where we do not.

AppFreeMulti-sourceWhatsApp/
Telegram
AI semantic
search
Auto-
organizes
Highlights /
annotations
Best for
MarkIt(ours)FreeOmnivore refugees who want a free, hosted home for everything they save - including chat forwards and screenshots, not just articles - and never want to run a server.
Readwise ReaderPaid onlyOmnivore power users whose core habit was highlighting articles and syncing those highlights into a notes vault.
ReadplaceLimitedPeople who want a straightforward hosted reader with highlights at a lower annual price than Readwise.
WallabagFreeBasicThe Omnivore users who chose it for open-source and data ownership, and are willing to run a server (or pay for hosting).
Raindrop.ioFreeBasicPeople who want to organize links and files in folders and collections rather than read and highlight articles.
Obsidian Web ClipperFreeBasicPeople whose real home is Obsidian and who want saved articles to live as local markdown notes they own.

Pricing and features change constantly across this category, and several of these apps are new. Verify current rates and features on each app's site before subscribing. Last verified August 5, 2026.

Quick comparison: Omnivore alternatives at a glance

The shortest version - what each app is best for, its key advantage, and what it costs.

AppBest ForKey AdvantagePricing
MarkIt (ours)Refugees who want a free hosted home for everything - not just articles - and no serverWhatsApp/Telegram + screenshot capture, plain-language search, fully hostedFree up to 40 saves/month (all AI included)
Readwise ReaderPower users who highlight and sync to Obsidian/NotionMature highlight layer + deepest reading feature set + AI~$119.88/year (30-day trial, no free tier)
ReadplacePeople who want a simple, cheaper hosted reader with highlightsBuilt for the Omnivore migration at a lower price~$49/year
WallabagPeople who need open-source self-hosting and data ownershipOpen source, self-hostable, full exportFree self-hosted; hosted ~EUR 11/year
Raindrop.ioPeople who want a folder-based bookmark managerUnlimited free bookmarks with collections, mature appsFree unlimited; Pro ~$3/month
Obsidian Web ClipperPeople who already live in Obsidian and want local markdownFree clips saved as markdown you own, inside your vaultFree

The six options, reviewed

We start with MarkIt (ours) so the disclosure is up front, then the alternatives - grouped by whether you want highlighting, self-hosting, or a free hosted place for everything.

1. MarkIt(that's us)

mark-it.co

Capture from anywhere - WhatsApp, Telegram, screenshots, the web - find it by plain language. Free, hosted, nothing to self-host.

Best for: Omnivore refugees who want a free, hosted home for everything they save - including chat forwards and screenshots, not just articles - and never want to run a server.
Pricing: Free up to 40 saves/month, all AI features included. Pro is in early access.

MarkIt is the one we built, so the honest disclosure goes first: if what you loved about Omnivore was the highlighting layer - marking up an article, syncing those highlights into Obsidian or a notes vault - MarkIt does not do that, and Readwise Reader is the closer replacement. MarkIt has no in-text highlights, no reader mode, and no text-to-speech. But a lot of Omnivore refugees are not chasing the highlighting. They picked Omnivore because it was free and open, and now they just want somewhere to put the things they save without paying $119 a year or standing up a server. That is exactly the gap MarkIt fills. It is free and fully hosted - there is nothing to self-host, no Docker, no database to babysit. Capture is not article-only: forward a link, a screenshot, a TikTok, an Instagram post, a LinkedIn article, a YouTube video (with its transcript), or a PDF to the MarkIt WhatsApp agent or Telegram agent and it lands in your library with a title, tags, and a one-line summary already written. There is a Chrome extension and a phone share-sheet flow too. Then recall: search is semantic, so 'that pricing article I saved last month' finds the right item even when the title never says pricing. AI auto-categorizes everything into topics and writes summaries, so you never build folders. Your data is exportable as JSON anytime. Where MarkIt is not the right call: if highlighting, annotation, distraction-free reading, or self-hosting-for-data-ownership was the point of Omnivore for you, MarkIt is not that tool - see Readwise Reader or Wallabag below.

Pros
  • - Free and fully hosted - no server, no Docker, no self-hosting
  • - WhatsApp + Telegram agent capture (no other tool on this list has this)
  • - Plain-language semantic search - find saves by meaning, not exact keywords
  • - AI auto-categorization and summaries - no folders to build
  • - Multi-source: links, screenshots (with OCR), Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, Reddit, YouTube transcripts, PDFs
  • - Genuinely free tier (40 saves/month, all AI included) with JSON export
Cons
  • - No in-text highlights or annotation layer - the biggest gap for Omnivore power users
  • - No reader mode or text-to-speech
  • - No Obsidian / notes-vault highlight sync
  • - Newer product; no native iOS or Android app yet (PWA only)

The fix if you want Omnivore-style free capture without self-hosting, and you save more than articles. Not the pick if in-text highlighting and Obsidian sync were the whole reason you used Omnivore.

2. Readwise Reader

readwise.io

The power-reader with highlights that sync into Obsidian, Notion, and Readwise.

Best for: Omnivore power users whose core habit was highlighting articles and syncing those highlights into a notes vault.
Pricing: $9.99/mo billed annually (~$119.88/yr, bundled in Readwise Full). 30-day trial, no permanent free tier. Verify current pricing on their site.

For the Omnivore user whose whole workflow was read, highlight, and push those highlights into Obsidian, Readwise Reader is the honest closest match. It handles articles, RSS, newsletters, PDFs, EPUBs, and YouTube with transcripts, has text-to-speech, a Ghostreader AI that summarizes and explains, semantic search, and - the part that matters here - a mature highlight layer that syncs automatically into Notion, Obsidian, and Readwise. If highlighting is the reason you are sad Omnivore is gone, this is the tool the Omnivore community most often migrated to. The catch is money and shape. There is no permanent free tier: it is bundled in Readwise Full at about $119.88/year after a 30-day trial, which is a real jump from Omnivore's free. And, like Omnivore, it is reading-shaped - it does not absorb a WhatsApp forward, a screenshot with OCR, or the mixed non-article pile most people also save.

Pros
  • - Mature highlight layer that syncs to Obsidian, Notion, and Readwise
  • - Deepest reading feature set (RSS, newsletters, PDFs, EPUBs, YouTube)
  • - Ghostreader AI summaries, explanations, and semantic search
  • - Text-to-speech and excellent cross-device apps
Cons
  • - No permanent free tier - ~$119.88/year after trial (a jump from Omnivore free)
  • - Reading-shaped, not multi-source capture
  • - No WhatsApp/Telegram or screenshot capture
  • - Steeper learning curve

The closest replacement if highlighting and Obsidian/Notion sync were why you used Omnivore - and you do not mind paying for it.

3. Readplace

readplace.com

A simple, cheaper read-later app positioned directly at Omnivore refugees.

Best for: People who want a straightforward hosted reader with highlights at a lower annual price than Readwise.
Pricing: Around $49/year (verify current pricing on their site).

Readplace is one of the newer read-later apps that leaned directly into the Omnivore shutdown, pitching itself as the simpler, cheaper hosted replacement at roughly $49/year. It keeps the parts most casual Omnivore users cared about - save an article, read it cleanly, highlight it - without asking you to run anything yourself. If your Omnivore use was mostly 'save articles, read them, highlight a few lines,' and Readwise's price and depth are more than you want, Readplace is a reasonable lighter landing spot. It is still an article-and-reading tool. It does not capture WhatsApp or Telegram forwards, run OCR on screenshots, or pull in TikToks and PDFs into one library, and there is no plain-language AI search or auto-categorization across a mixed pile. Confirm its current feature set and price before committing, since new apps in this category move fast.

Pros
  • - Hosted reader with highlights, no self-hosting
  • - Cheaper than Readwise (~$49/year)
  • - Explicitly built for the Omnivore migration
  • - Simple and focused
Cons
  • - Article-and-reading shaped - not multi-source capture
  • - No WhatsApp/Telegram or screenshot capture
  • - No plain-language AI search or auto-categorization
  • - Newer, smaller product - verify features and longevity

A lighter, cheaper hosted reader than Readwise if you want reading plus highlights without the full Readwise machinery or price.

4. Wallabag

wallabag.org

The open-source, self-hostable read-later app - if owning your data is the point.

Best for: The Omnivore users who chose it for open-source and data ownership, and are willing to run a server (or pay for hosting).
Pricing: Free if you self-host (open source). Hosted wallabag.it is around EUR 11/year. Verify current pricing on their site.

Omnivore was open source, and a chunk of its users chose it specifically because they could own and, if they wanted, self-host their reading. Wallabag is the natural home for that crowd: it is a mature, open-source read-later app you can self-host for free, with browser extensions, mobile apps, tagging, annotations, and full export. If data ownership and open source are non-negotiable, Wallabag is the most honest recommendation on this page - it is the one tool here you can run entirely yourself. The tradeoff is exactly the one MarkIt is built to remove: to get it free you run and maintain a server, and if you would rather not, the hosted wallabag.it plan is a small annual fee. It is also article-and-web focused - no WhatsApp/Telegram capture, no screenshot OCR, no AI auto-categorization or semantic search. Great for control; not the tool if you want zero maintenance and a mixed capture library.

Pros
  • - Open source and self-hostable - full data ownership
  • - Mature: browser extensions, mobile apps, tags, annotations, export
  • - Free forever if you host it yourself
  • - Cheap hosted option (~EUR 11/year) if you do not want to run it
Cons
  • - Self-hosting means running and maintaining a server
  • - Article-and-web focused - no chat, screenshot, or social capture
  • - No AI auto-categorization or plain-language semantic search
  • - More setup than a hosted app for non-technical users

The honest pick if the open-source, own-your-data part of Omnivore is what you cannot give up - and you accept running or paying to host it.

5. Raindrop.io

raindrop.io

Mature bookmark manager with collections and a reader mode.

Best for: People who want to organize links and files in folders and collections rather than read and highlight articles.
Pricing: Free unlimited bookmarks. Pro around $3/month for full-text search and nested collections. Verify current pricing on their site.

Raindrop is the default recommendation when someone wants a real bookmark manager rather than a reader. It has been around since 2013, the apps are mature on every platform, the browser extension is good, and the free tier (unlimited bookmarks, basic search, reader mode) is genuinely useful. Its collections-and-tags model suits people who think in folders and want a hosted home for links and files they organize by hand - no server to run. The limits for an ex-Omnivore reader: it is a URL-and-file bookmark manager, not a highlighting reader. Its annotation layer is light, forwarding a WhatsApp screenshot does not work, there is no OCR, no AI auto-categorization, and search is keyword across titles and tags, not plain-language. Good for organizing links; not a like-for-like Omnivore reading replacement.

Pros
  • - Unlimited free bookmarks, mature hosted apps everywhere
  • - Collections + tags + nested folders for manual organization
  • - Reader mode and a cheap paid tier (~$3/mo)
  • - Handles files and links, not just articles
Cons
  • - Bookmark manager, not a highlighting reader
  • - No WhatsApp/Telegram or screenshot capture
  • - Keyword search only, no semantic search
  • - No AI summaries or auto-categorization

The pick if what you actually want is a folder-based bookmark manager, not a reader. Different job than Omnivore.

6. Obsidian Web Clipper

obsidian.md

Free clipper that saves pages straight into your Obsidian vault as markdown.

Best for: People whose real home is Obsidian and who want saved articles to live as local markdown notes they own.
Pricing: Free (Obsidian is free for personal use; the Web Clipper extension is free).

For Omnivore users whose center of gravity was always Obsidian, the official Obsidian Web Clipper is a free way to save web pages directly into your vault as clean markdown you fully own, locally. Combined with Obsidian's own highlighting and linking, it recreates a chunk of the read-and-annotate loop without any subscription. If you already live in Obsidian and want your saves as local notes rather than in yet another app, this is the free, own-your-data route. But it is a clipper, not a read-later system: capture is browser-only (no WhatsApp/Telegram, no screenshot OCR, no TikTok/PDF pipeline), reading and organizing happen inside Obsidian and are on you to set up, and search is Obsidian's keyword search, not plain-language semantic search. It rewards people who want to build their own workflow, not people who want it done for them.

Pros
  • - Free, and your clips are local markdown you own
  • - Deep fit if Obsidian is already your notes home
  • - Highlighting and linking via Obsidian itself
  • - No subscription, no vendor lock-in
Cons
  • - Browser-only clipping - no chat, screenshot, or social capture
  • - You build the reading and organizing workflow yourself
  • - Keyword search only (Obsidian), no plain-language AI search
  • - No auto-categorization or summaries

A free, own-your-data option if Obsidian is already your second brain and you want clips as local markdown - with the work that implies.

Frequently asked questions

ElevenLabs acquired the Omnivore team on November 1, 2024, and the Omnivore read-later service shut down two weeks later on November 15, 2024, with all user data deleted after that date. Users had a 14-day window to export their articles, highlights, and notes. ElevenLabs wanted the team for its ElevenReader app; the Omnivore product itself was discontinued.

The hosted Omnivore service is gone. Omnivore was open source, so its code still exists on GitHub and technically can be self-hosted, but it is no longer maintained and standing it up yourself is a real project. For most people the practical move is to migrate to an actively maintained app. If self-hosting an open-source reader is the point, Wallabag is the better-supported choice.

It depends on why you used Omnivore. If highlighting and Obsidian sync were the point, Readwise Reader is the closest replacement. If you want a cheaper hosted reader, Readplace. If open-source self-hosting is non-negotiable, Wallabag. If you already live in Obsidian, its free Web Clipper. And if you want a free, hosted home for everything you save - WhatsApp forwards, screenshots, social posts, and articles - with plain-language search and no server to run, MarkIt is built for that.

That is the most common Omnivore-refugee situation, and it is exactly what MarkIt is for. MarkIt is fully hosted and free to start - no server, no Docker, nothing to maintain. You capture by forwarding to its WhatsApp or Telegram agent, using the Chrome extension, or the web, and everything is auto-organized and searchable in plain language. Readplace and Raindrop are also hosted options; only Wallabag and self-hosted Omnivore require you to run something.

Yes. MarkIt has a genuinely free tier (40 saves/month with all AI features), the Obsidian Web Clipper is free, and Wallabag is free if you self-host it. Readwise Reader has no permanent free tier (~$119.88/year), and Readplace is around $49/year.

No, and that is an honest tradeoff. MarkIt has no in-text highlighting, no annotation layer, no reader mode, and no Obsidian highlight sync. If that was the core of your Omnivore workflow, Readwise Reader or Wallabag is the better fit. MarkIt's strength is capturing from everywhere - chat apps, screenshots, social, the web - and finding any save by plain language, all free and hosted.

There is no one-click Omnivore importer today, and we want to be honest about that. Most people move the small set of saves they actually revisit by re-saving them (forward a link to the MarkIt agent and it is filed in seconds). If you kept your Omnivore export and have a large library you want moved, email tomer@mark-it.co and we will help you figure out the fastest path.

Free, hosted, and captures more than articles

No server. No subscription. Just save things again.

Free up to 40 saves a month. WhatsApp agent, Telegram agent, Chrome extension, screenshot OCR, plain-language search, and JSON export. Nothing to self-host.

Start free

Want to see it first? See how MarkIt works in 3 steps, or compare the reading-focused tools.